National Center for Teacher Effectiveness

National Center for Teacher Effectiveness

How are multiple measures used in teacher evaluation related to one another and student learning? 

In July 2009, NCTE commenced a six-year effort to join disparate strands of education research, and develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of how to measure teacher and teaching effectiveness. NCTE is developing valid measures of effective mathematics teaching to be shared with practitioners, policymakers, and researchers. The measures may help target and plan teacher training, and improve teacher observation and feedback processes. 

NCTE

Location: Massachusetts, Georgia & Washington, D.C.

There are three key strands of the work:

  • The core study Developing Measures of Effective Mathematics Teaching, which included a extensive data collection effort, and the development of valid and reliable tools to the field of education. Read the research overview.
  • Supplementary studies that aim to be responsive to the needs of education practitioners and policymakers. These studies investigate professional environments, teacher effects, teacher evaluation systems, and item response theory.
  • National leadership activities such as conferences and webinars. You can learn more about these topics by accessing our resources below. 

The project is led by Harvard Graduate School of Education Professors Thomas J. Kane and Heather Hill, Dartmouth College Professor Douglas O. Staiger, and Project Director Corinne Herlihy.

Partners

Education Agencies

With the goal of positioning ourselves as a national resource on teacher effectiveness research, we have partnered with four school districts on the east coast to conduct rigorous research, develop tools, and share best practices and lessons learned in teacher evaluation and professional development.

Funder

The National Center for Teacher Effectiveness is supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305C090023 to the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University.

People

Heather C. Hill

Principal Investigator, MQI Coaching
PIER FELLOWSHIP FACULTY MENTOR
Hazen-Nicoli Professorship in Teacher Learning and Practice, Harvard Graduate School of Education
Heather Hill studies policies and programs designed to improve teacher and teaching quality. Her recent research focuses on teacher professional development; instructional coaching; teacher evaluation; changes over time in teachers’ mathematical knowledge...
Heather Hill

Thomas J. Kane

Faculty Director
Walter H. Gale Professor of Education and Economics, Harvard Graduate School of Education
Member, Yidan Prize Foundation Council of Luminaries
Thomas Kane is an economist, Walter H. Gale Professor of Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, member of the Yidan Prize Foundation Council of Luminaries, and faculty director of CEPR. Between 2009 and 2012, he directed the Measures of...
tom_kane_2022_revised_pic_1.jpg

Erica Litke

Research Assistant
Doctoral Student
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Erica Litke is a doctoral student in the education policy, leadership, and instructional practice concentration at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Her research focuses on secondary math instruction and issues of equity. She is particularly...
erica-litke.jpg

John Papay

Affiliated Researcher; SDP Fellowship Faculty Advisor
Associate Professor of Education and Economics
Department of Education, Brown University
jpapay.jpg

Cynthia Pollard

Research Assistant
Doctoral Student
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Cynthia is a doctoral student at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Previously, she was a research project manager for NCTE at CEPR. Her work included coordinating video observations in participating school districts, supporting raters with the...
cynthia-pollard.jpg

Resources

Working Paper

Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M., Hill, H., & Staiger, D. (n.d.). Explaining Teacher Effects on Achievement Using Measures from Multiple Research Traditions.
Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M., Hill, H., & Staiger, D. (n.d.). Explaining Teacher Effects on Achievement Using Measures from Multiple Research Traditions.
McGinn, D., Kelcey, B., Hill, H., & Chin, M. (n.d.). Using Item Response Theory to Learn about Observational Instruments.
McGinn, D., Kelcey, B., Hill, H., & Chin, M. (n.d.). Using Item Response Theory to Learn about Observational Instruments.
Kelcey, B., McGinn, D., Hill, H. C., & Charalambous, C. (n.d.). The Generalizability of Item Parameters Across Lessons.
Kelcey, B., McGinn, D., Hill, H. C., & Charalambous, C. (n.d.). The Generalizability of Item Parameters Across Lessons.

2015

2014

Kelcey, B., Hill, H., & McGinn, D. (2014). Approximate measurement invariance in cross-classified rater-mediated assessments. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1469).
Kelcey, B., Hill, H., & McGinn, D. (2014). Approximate measurement invariance in cross-classified rater-mediated assessments. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1469).

News

Who is an Effective Teacher?

CEPR Faculty Director Thomas Kane discusses the minimum standard of effectiveness for teachers in the following Brookings Institution paper. As states and districts implement new teacher evaluation systems, they will struggle to differentiate between...

Prioritizing Teaching Quality in a New System of Teacher Evalaution

National Center for Teacher Effectiveness (NCTE) leaders Heather Hill and Corinne Herlihy emphasize the importance of focusing on the quality of teaching, and not "teacher quality," in the following article published in the Education Outlook Series by the...

Methods

In the fall of 2010, NCTE commenced three years of data collection and observations of math instruction across approximately 50 schools and 300 classrooms, respectively. Data was collected from several sources, including multiple classroom observations, student assessment data, and teacher surveys to accurately capture how teachers impact student achievement.

Learn more about the findings in the teacher effectiveness section of our publications

Data Collection Components:

  • Video observations of math instruction (in classroom, length of math lesson)
    • three video observations per year
    • coding of practices along multiple rubrics
  • Survey of teacher characteristics and measures of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching (take home, 60 min.)
  • Student engagement surveys (in classroom, 10 min.)
    • captures interest and effort in math, interaction with their teachers, and attitudes and behaviors in school
  • Supplemental measures of student achievement (in classroom, 60 min.)
    • focus on a handful of math concepts that are fundamental to progressing in mathematics in these grade levels.

School Eligibility Requirements:
In order to have been eligible to participate in the study, schools must have had at least two teachers of math in Grade 4 and/or two teachers of math in Grade 5. The school principal and teachers must also have agreed to have teachers assigned to classes in Year 3 (2012–13) through the following process:

  1. The principal/teachers will draw up classroom rosters as usual.
  2. Working with NCTE staff, the principal will assign participating teachers to classes (or math class rosters) in their grade by lottery.

Featured Resource

Working Paper

Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M., Hill, H., & Staiger, D. (n.d.). Explaining Teacher Effects on Achievement Using Measures from Multiple Research Traditions.
Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M., Hill, H., & Staiger, D. (n.d.). Explaining Teacher Effects on Achievement Using Measures from Multiple Research Traditions.

Tools

NCTE sought to provide valid and reliable tools for the field of education. The links below will connect you to the instruments that NCTE developed and/or used in the core study. Additionally, NCTE developed a Video Library that contains video examples of a range classroom mathematics instruction in the United States, and project data from the core study is archived at the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).  

 

October 20 and 27, 2011

Supporting Rater Accuracy and Consistency in Classroom Observation

The purpose of this webinar series was to provide an opportunity for states to hear from and ask questions of experts who help to design and implement classroom observation systems that support rater accuracy and consistency. The National Center for Teacher Effectiveness invited six organizations that are currently supporting this type of work in states and districts to describe what they do and what they have learned to help implement these systems at scale.

The organizations shared a variety of approaches, some with similar elements, and some different. Participants were encouraged to think about how these approaches may or may not work in each state's policy climate and ask questions to best inform their policy decisions.

Webinar Syntheses by Topic

NCTE compiled information by topic via webinar syntheses. Below you will also find background information, PowerPoint slides, and the webinar recording for each of the presentations.

 

Cambridge Education

About the organization, speaker, and contact info

PowerPoint presentation

Video

 

National Institute for Excellence in Teaching 

About the organization, speaker, and contact info

PowerPoint presentation

Additional publications

Video

 

Pearson

About the organization, speaker, and contact info

PowerPoint Presentation

Video

 

Teachscape

About the organization, speaker, and contact info

PowerPoint presentation

Video

 

Teachstone

About the organization, speaker, and contact info

PowerPoint presentation

Video

 

TNTP

About the organization, speaker, and contact info

PowerPoint presentation

Video